Menu

Asset Protection / State guide

Missouri Asset Protection & Claims Guide

Missouri excludes hail damage from the repair-cost calculation used in its 80% salvage definition for vehicles damaged within six years of the model year.

Written by James BishopFounder, ClaimStinger

01 / Total loss / salvage threshold

Total loss / salvage threshold

Missouri’s salvage definition uses repair costs exceeding 80% of fair market value for vehicles damaged within six years of the manufacturer’s model year.

That calculation expressly excludes inflatable restraints, tires, sound systems, hail damage, and sales tax. The salvage-title procedure is separate.

Citation: RSMo § 301.010(55); RSMo § 301.227

02 / The insurer’s total-loss settlement duty

The insurer’s total-loss settlement duty

Missouri’s 80% rule is a salvage or title-classification rule, not necessarily a contractual settlement rule.

A requirement to provide comparable-vehicle valuations or third-party salvage auction bids was not verified. Missouri’s Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act is RSMo §§ 375.1000–375.1018; § 375.1007 concerns improper claims practices, but the Act generally requires a pattern or general business practice and does not create a private cause of action.

Citation: RSMo §§ 375.1000–375.1018; RSMo § 375.1007

03 / Time limit to pursue a third-party diminished value claim

Time limit to pursue a third-party diminished value claim

A Missouri noncontractual property-damage claim, including third-party diminished value, generally has a five-year limitation period.

RSMo § 516.120 covers injury to goods and chattels and other noncontractual injury to another’s rights. There is no separate diminished-value trigger; ordinarily the claim accrues when the property damage or right to damages arises. First-party diminished value is generally not required when the insurer elects to repair and the repairs restore the vehicle, under Camden v. State Farm, Spellman v. Sentry, and Lupo v. Shelter. The third-party claim is the viable route.

Citation: RSMo § 516.120; Camden v. State Farm; Spellman v. Sentry; Lupo v. Shelter (case law)

04 / Repair shop choice, parts disclosure and PDR

Repair shop choice, parts disclosure and PDR

No Missouri PDR-specific statute or technician-certification rule was verified.

No general PDR-specific consumer right to OEM paint preservation or OEM/aftermarket disclosure was verified.

Citation: No Missouri PDR-specific statute or technician-certification rule was verified in the supplied research.

05 / Hail damage treatment

Hail damage treatment

Missouri excludes hail damage from the repair-cost calculation used in its salvage definition.

The verified hail exclusion applies to Missouri’s salvage-definition calculation. It is not, by itself, a universal contractual settlement rule.

Citation: RSMo § 301.010(55)

Source record

Citations

  • RSMo § 301.010(55)
  • RSMo § 301.227
  • RSMo §§ 375.1000–375.1018
  • RSMo § 375.1007
  • RSMo § 516.120
  • Camden v. State Farm (case law)
  • Spellman v. Sentry (case law)
  • Lupo v. Shelter (case law)

Keep the record moving

Browse all answers →

Build the supporting record

A Diminished Value Claim Report can organize the facts, documents, and value evidence around the next claim decision.